Date: November 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was previously charged with Damage to Property, Threats of Violence, and Disorderly Conduct when they were 11 and 12 years old and going through the foster system in Brown County. Although her client successfully completed probation for these cases and the charges were dismissed, the records still remained. Dani’s client worried how these charges would affect their ability to obtain employment, educational opportunities, and housing. So, Dani filed petitions for expungement in Brown County District court and argued on behalf of her client’s future to get the records sealed. Ultimately, the Court granted the expungements, which means the juvenile records will not be viewable on their criminal record or at any other agency with records of the incident.
Date: October 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was previously convicted of possessing a small amount of marijuana in a motor vehicle and drug paraphernalia in Scott County approximately three years ago. Although her client was never on formal probation for the incident, the drug convictions, a petty misdemeanor and misdemeanor, were still on their record, and they worried about their job security as well as the negative stigma attached to a drug offense. Dani filed a petition and argued on behalf of her client to get these records sealed. Ultimately, the Court granted the expungement for her client, which means the drug convictions are no longer viewable on her client’s criminal record or at any other agency with records of the incident.
Date: August 2021
Case: First-Degree Controlled Substance Sale
Attorney: Mike Brandt
Result: Mike was retained to assist a client charged with First-Degree Controlled Substance in Douglas County. Based upon his client’s record, Mike’s client was looking at a sentence of 75 months in prison. However, based upon legal issues that Mike raised and the steps Mike’s client took to rehabilitate himself, Mike was able to negotiate a downward dispositional departure and his client was able to avoid prison time. Instead of prison, the client was placed on probation for 10 years.
In addition to this charge, Mike was also successful in getting his client discharged from probation on 2 felonies and also succeeded in persuading a prosecutor to dismiss another drug case based upon his client’s plea to the First Degree charge.
Date: August 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was previously granted a stay of adjudication on a disorderly conduct charge in Carver County. Dani’s client was afraid this incident would impact her ability to pursue a career in therapy. Dani filed a petition and negotiated with the prosecutor for Carver County and was able to get the prosecutor to agree to an expungement. This means that the disorderly conduct charge and dismissal, from the successfully completed stay of adjudication, will no longer be viewable by the public on her client’s criminal record or at any other agency with records of the incident.
Date: August 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was previously granted a continuance for dismissal for a domestic assault charge in Anoka County. After one year, the charge was dismissed. Although Dani’s client did not plead guilty, the record of the incident still existed on his criminal record. Dani spoke with the prosecutor and reached an agreement that granted an expungement for her client without her client having to argue his case or attend a hearing. This means that the domestic assault incident and resolution are no longer publicly viewable and are not visible on his criminal record.
Date: March 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was previously convicted of third degree assault in Ramsey County. Dani’s client had their employment adversely affected due to the offense. Dani filed a petition and argued on behalf of her client for expungement and ultimately, was able to secure an expungement on behalf of her client. This means that the third degree assault charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s criminal record or at any other agency with records of the incident.
Date: March 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was previously convicted of possessing an unauthorized weapon in Hennepin County. Dani’s client had their employment adversely affected due to the offense. Dani filed a petition and argued on behalf of her client for expungement and ultimately, was able to secure an expungement on behalf of her client. This means that the possessing an unauthorized weapon charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s criminal record or at any other agency with records of the incident.
Date: February 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was originally convicted of Misdemeanor Theft. This offense had made it difficult for her client to obtain consistent employment. Dani agreed to help her client seek an expungement in order to ensure her client would no longer be negatively affected by the conviction. She was successful in obtaining an expungement order for her client, this means that the charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s criminal record.
Date: February 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was originally convicted of Misdemeanor Domestic Assault. Dani agreed to help her client seek an expungement in order to ensure her client would not be negatively affected by the conviction. She was successful in obtaining an expungement order for her client, this means that the charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s criminal record.
Date: February 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was originally convicted of failing to stop for a traffic collision in Hennepin County. Dani agreed to help her client seek an expungement in order to ensure her client would not be negatively affected by the conviction. She was successful in obtaining an expungement order for her client, this means that the charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s criminal record.
